[i]Lachmann P. The research integrity initiative: progress report. Cope Report 2002:11.
[ii]Mulligan A. Is peer review in crisis. Oral Oncol. 2005 Feb;41(2):135-41.
[iii]Publons. Clarivate Analytics. In: Global State of Peer Review. Philadelphia, PA: Clarivate Analytics; 2018
[iv]Vesper I. Peer reviewers unmasked: largest global survey reveals trends. Nature 2019. Available at nature.com.
[v]Breuning M, Backstrom J, Brannon J, Gross BI, Widmeier M. Reviewer fatigue? Why scholars decline to review their peers’ work. PS Political Sci Politics 2015;48:595e600
[vi]Publons. Clarivate Analytics. In: Global State of Peer Review. Philadelphia, PA: Clarivate Analytics; 2018
[vii]Fox CW, Albert AYK, Vines TH. Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution. Res Integr Peer Rev 2017;2:3
[viii]Ellwanger JH, Chies JAB. We need to talk about peer-review-Experienced reviewers are not endangered species, but they need motivation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;125:201-5
[ix]Fox CW. Difficulty of recruiting reviewers predicts review scores and editorial decisions at six journals of ecology and evolution. Scientometrics 2017;113:465e77
[x]Chang, J., & Lai, C. (2001). Is It Worthwhile to Pay Referees? Southern Economic Journal, 68(2), 457-463. doi:10.2307/1061605
[xi]Thompson, Gary D., Aradhyula, Satheesh V., Frisvold, George, Tronstad, Russell (2010), Does Paying Referees Expedite Reviews?: Results of a Natural Experiment. Southern Economic Journal: January 2010, Vol. 76, No. 3, 678– 692.
[xii]Tite L, Schroter S. Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A Survey. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:9e12.
[xiii]Gagné, M. and Deci, E.L. (2005), Self‐determination theory and work motivation. J. Organiz. Behav., 26: 331-362. doi:10.1002/job.322
[xiv]Gneezy, Uri, Stephan Meier, and Pedro Rey-Biel. 2011. “When and Why Incentives (Don’t) Work to Modify Behavior.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25 (4): 191-210. DOI: 10.1257/jep.25.4.191
[xv]Gallus, J. and Frey, B.S. (2016), Awards: A strategic management perspective. Strat. Mgmt. J., 37: 1699-1714. doi:10.1002/smj.2415
[xvi]Gasparyan AY, Gerasimov AN, Voronov AA, Kitas GD. Rewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication. J Korean Med Sci 2015;30:360e4
[xvii]Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Reviewers of the year – reviewer Award. J Clin Epidemiol 2018;104:146
[xviii]Nature Editorial. Three-year trial shows support for recognizing peer reviewers. Nature 2019;568:275
[xix]Zaharie MA, Seeber M. Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment. Scientometrics 2018;117:1587e609
Leave a Reply